Dunham & Jones, Experienced & Qualified Attorneys

800-499-8455

Make a Payment 
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense
    • Abandoning or Endangering a Child
    • Aggravated Kidnapping
    • Assault & Domestic Violence
    • Child Abuse or Neglect
    • Child Molestation
    • Child Pornography
    • Child Protective Services Investigation
    • Crimes Against Children
    • Criminal Investigations & Procedures
    • Continuous Child Sex Abuse
    • Continuous Violence Against the Family
    • Domestic Violence
    • Drugs & Possession
    • DWI Defense
    • Family Violence Defense
    • Felony Crimes
    • Human Trafficking Attorneys
    • Misdemeanor Crimes
    • Online Solicitation of a Minor
    • Sending & Receiving Explicit Photos
    • Sex Crimes
    • Sexual Assault & Battery
    • Statutory Rape
    • Theft Crimes
    • Weapons Crimes
  • Injury Lawyers
  • Attorneys
        • Paul Dunham
        • Scotty Jones
        • Jeremiah Alvarez
        • Jeff Archer
        • Matthew Arnold
        • Amanda Arrington
        • Allen Ayers
        • Terence Bajuk
        • Ivan Barrera
        • Darren Bertin
        • Dante Bria
        • Rustin Bridges
        • Kira Briggs
        • Mark Briley
        • Mark Brunner
        • Robert Buford
        • Matthew Byrne
        • Jeff Casey
        • Edward Castillo
        • Rick Chittum
        • Ryan Church
        • Jonathan Churchill
        • Will Clark
        • Craig Collins
        • Alec Comerford
        • Carly Cook
        • Robert Cowie
        • Frank Cyprian
        • Tristan Czajkoski
        • Michael Dahlenburg
        • Chad Davis
        • Kyle Eccles
        • Kathy Ehmann-Clardy
        • Rachel Ferraro
        • Justin Fischer
        • Derrick C. Flemming
        • Kaylyn Foreman
        • Remington Giller
        • Dean Godfrey
        • Angela Godoy
        • Leigh Gonnet
        • Jessica Gonzalez
        • Leo Gonzalez
        • Stephanie Gramada
        • Sidney Greehey
        • Benjamin Griffin
        • Ajaleigh Haley
        • Harper Haught
        • Rob Hayden
        • Mark Hendrickson
        • Alexander Hinshaw
        • Lacey Holloman
        • Fred Howey
        • Lindneshia Hudson
        • Ryan Huie
        • Zach Hundt
        • Nicholas Jackson
        • Chris Jeansonne
        • Angelica Johnson
        • Bo Jones
        • Weston Jones
        • Alex Joyner
        • Theo Kadia
        • Abby Keese
        • Lance Kitchens
        • Jackie Kopetsky
        • Robert Leahey
        • Rafael Ledesma
        • Nesha Lewis
        • Jessica Lieck
        • Joseph Lindberg
        • Clayton Littlefield
        • Joseph Lopez, III
        • Ray Lozano
        • Makayla Maxwell-Stallcup
        • Ian Mayfield
        • J. Michael McBride
        • Caitlin Meriwether
        • Kyle Miller
        • Amy Mintah
        • Joseph Minton
        • Kaleb Moore
        • Milton Mullanax
        • Wes Navidomskis
        • Natnael Niguisse
        • John Nollette
        • Chris Parks
        • Scott Pertee
        • Sim Peter
        • Scarlet Petrucci
        • David Phelps
        • David Phillips
        • Lia Polk
        • Tony Pollreisz
        • Simon Rawls
        • Willis Ray
        • Thomas Reed
        • Brian Risinger
        • Israel Rojas, Jr.
        • Jordan Rosselli
        • Danielle Saenz
        • Jacob Salinas
        • Deborah Sandheinrich
        • John Sandheinrich
        • Alexandra Schooley
        • JD Schmidt
        • Matt Shanks
        • Darice Shaw
        • Jeremy Sims
        • Perry Sims
        • Scott Sinsabaugh
        • Jonathan Skupin
        • Sara Spector
        • G. Alan Steele
        • Chase Stewart
        • Donald Strickland
        • Thad Thomason
        • Emma Thompson
        • Sara Thornburg
        • Kordell Tindle
        • Victoria Ukoh
        • Mary Vanravenswaay
        • Yancarlo Villa
        • Helen Wang
        • Warren Waterman
        • Mackenzie Watson
        • Caleb Weeldreyer
        • Jamil Wilkerson
        • Christopher Wilkes
        • Sean Wright
  • Make a Payment
What If the Police Arrest the Wrong Person in Texas?
Dunham & Jones

What If the Police Arrest the Wrong Person in Texas?

Legally reviewed by Chris Jeansonne, Criminal Defense Attorney, Dunham & Jones, Attorneys at Law, P.C. · Last reviewed: October 9, 2026

You are driving home from work when police lights suddenly appear behind you.

You pull over. Instead of walking casually toward your window, officers order you to keep your hands visible and step out of the vehicle. You are handcuffed. Maybe several officers have their weapons drawn.

You have never been arrested. You have no idea what is happening.

Then an officer tells you your vehicle was reported stolen.

There is only one problem.

It wasn’t.

The car belongs to you. You have the registration. You have the insurance. Nobody has ever reported it stolen.

Or maybe the mistake is even stranger. Police tell you that there is a warrant for your arrest in another Texas county. The name on the warrant is yours, but the person police are actually looking for is someone else.

Or a witness identified you as the person who committed a robbery while you were somewhere else.

Or someone was arrested months ago, gave police your name and date of birth, skipped court, and left you with the warrant.

When police arrest the wrong person, knowing that you are innocent does not necessarily make the problem disappear immediately. An officer may have information that legally justified the initial detention or arrest even when that information later proves to be wrong.

What you do next can matter enormously.

What If the Police Arrest the Wrong Person in Texas?

How Can Police Arrest the Wrong Person?

There is no single kind of mistaken arrest.

Police might arrest someone because two people have similar names. A database may contain incorrect information. Someone else may have deliberately used the innocent person’s identity. A witness may confidently identify the wrong suspect. Police may associate the wrong person with a vehicle, address, or phone. Surveillance footage may be misinterpreted.

Modern police technology creates still more possibilities.

Automatic license plate readers such as Flock cameras can photograph vehicles and compare license plates against law-enforcement information. These systems can be extremely useful investigative tools, but an automated alert is still based on data, images, and matching processes that can be wrong.

A plate can be misread. A character can be obscured. Information associated with a plate can be inaccurate or outdated. A vehicle can resemble another vehicle.

That can create a frightening situation in which the police officers conducting the stop genuinely believe they may be approaching a stolen vehicle while the driver genuinely has done absolutely nothing wrong.

The important question is not simply whether the police were ultimately mistaken.

It is where the mistake occurred, what the officers reasonably knew at the time, and what happened after information emerged showing that they had the wrong person.

What If a Flock Camera Incorrectly Flags My Car as Stolen?

Imagine that a license plate reader generates an alert indicating that your vehicle may be stolen.

Police locate the vehicle and initiate a stop. Because officers believe they may be dealing with a stolen car, the encounter could be considerably more serious than an ordinary traffic stop. Depending on the circumstances, officers may order occupants from the vehicle, handcuff them, or take other precautions while determining what is happening.

Then they discover that the alert was wrong.

Perhaps the plate was misread. Perhaps the stolen vehicle had a similar plate. Perhaps the database information was incorrect.

The fact that technology contributed to the mistake does not automatically answer whether the police acted unlawfully. Courts generally examine what information officers had and whether their actions were reasonable under the circumstances.

There is an important difference between an officer reasonably investigating an apparently legitimate stolen-vehicle alert and officers continuing to detain someone after information available to them makes clear that the person or vehicle does not match.

Automated systems can generate leads. They do not make machines infallible.

What If Police Have a Warrant for Someone With My Name?

Having the same name as a wanted person can create a particularly difficult form of mistaken identity.

Suppose police are looking for John Michael Smith, age 38. Unfortunately, another John Michael Smith gets stopped.

Some identifying information might match. Other information might not.

The warrant could describe someone substantially taller or older. Photographs may not match. Fingerprints may be different. The wanted person may have distinctive tattoos. Dates of birth, middle names, driver’s license numbers, or other identifiers may differ.

Federal case law applying in Texas has long recognized that officers cannot simply treat a matching name as the end of the inquiry in every circumstance. At the same time, officers executing an apparently valid warrant are not necessarily required to conduct a complete investigation into the underlying suspect’s guilt before making an arrest.

That distinction matters.

The person named in a warrant could be correctly identified and arrested but ultimately innocent of the crime.

Or police could arrest an entirely different human being who happens to resemble the person identified in the warrant.

Those are two different problems.

What If Someone Used My Name When They Were Arrested?

This scenario can be even more disturbing because the innocent person’s identity can become tangled with someone else’s criminal history.

Suppose someone is arrested and falsely tells police that she is Jane Doe. She provides Jane’s birth date and other identifying information.

The real Jane Doe knows nothing about it.

The impostor is released and later misses court.

Months later, the real Jane is stopped for a broken taillight.

The officer discovers a warrant associated with her identity.

Simply saying, “That wasn’t me!” may not immediately make the warrant disappear.

This is one reason fingerprints, booking photographs, and other identifying information can become extremely important in mistaken-identity cases.

Texas law specifically recognizes this problem. Under Article 55A.006 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a person can be entitled to expunction of identifying information in certain mistaken-identity situations, including when inaccurate identifying information resulted from a clerical error or when another arrested person falsely used the innocent person’s identifying information without permission.

The statutory application process for mistaken identity specifically contemplates authenticated fingerprints.

In other words, Texas law recognizes that sometimes the criminal record really does belong to somebody else.

What If Police Arrest the Person They Intended to Arrest, but That Person Is Innocent?

This is different from mistaken identity.

Imagine that a robbery victim identifies Robert.

Police investigate and develop probable cause to believe Robert committed the robbery. They arrest him.

Then surveillance video establishes that Robert was somewhere else.

Police arrested exactly the person they intended to arrest. The evidence underlying that decision was simply wrong.

An arrest does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Probable cause is a substantially lower standard than the evidence necessary to convict someone at trial.

That means an innocent person can sometimes be arrested without the arrest itself necessarily being unlawful.

The mistake might come from an eyewitness. Someone could falsely accuse another person. Brothers may look similar. A suspect may have been driving someone else’s vehicle. A phone associated with one person may have been carried by somebody else. Video footage may be unclear.

The fact that someone can eventually prove innocence does not necessarily mean police lacked probable cause when the arrest occurred.

What If I Can Prove Immediately That Police Have the Wrong Person?

Tell them.

But there is an enormous difference between clearly identifying the mistake and trying to talk your way through an entire criminal investigation.

Suppose police arrest you for a crime committed Tuesday afternoon.

You know you were on an airplane at the time. Or your workplace has security footage showing you at your desk. Or the wanted person has a full-sleeve tattoo and you do not. Or the officer says your car is stolen and the registration in your glove compartment shows that it belongs to you.

You can calmly tell officers that there has been a mistake and point them toward objective information that may establish it.

You do not need to spend the next 45 minutes answering every investigative question an officer asks.

Should I Say I’m Innocent or Invoke My Right to Remain Silent?

Both ideas can coexist.

If police appear to have mistaken you for someone else, it may be useful to say something concise such as: “I believe you have the wrong person. Please compare my identification, photograph, and fingerprints with the person named in the warrant. I want an attorney, and I do not want to answer questions about the alleged offense without my attorney.”

In a mistaken stolen-vehicle situation, someone might similarly explain: “This is my vehicle. It has never been stolen. My registration and insurance are in my name. I do not consent to a search, and I do not want to answer investigative questions without an attorney.”

The goal is not to argue the entire case beside the highway.

The goal is to communicate the potentially verifiable mistake without volunteering a long statement that could create new problems.

There is also an important distinction between refusing to discuss the alleged crime and refusing to identify yourself.

Under Texas Penal Code Section 38.02, a person who has been lawfully arrested can commit an offense by intentionally refusing to provide a requested name, residence address, or date of birth. Texas law also prohibits intentionally providing false identifying information in specified circumstances.

So “I am exercising my right to remain silent” should not be confused with “I am going to give the police a fake name.”

Provide accurate identifying information when legally required. Clearly state that police have the wrong person if that is what you believe. Then ask for an attorney before discussing the alleged crime.

Should I Keep Insisting That They Have the Wrong Person?

You can calmly repeat the essential information.

You do not need to win the argument.

If an officer has decided to arrest you, becoming increasingly confrontational is unlikely to resolve a mistaken-identity problem on the side of the road.

Remember what you have already told officers. Remember what they tell you. If possible, remember which agency is involved and why they say you are being arrested.

Then get an experienced criminal defense attorney involved as quickly as possible.

An attorney can communicate with law enforcement and prosecutors without the emotional pressure of being the person sitting in handcuffs.

Can I Resist If I Know the Arrest Is Wrong?

Do not physically resist an arrest simply because you know police have the wrong person.

Texas Penal Code Section 38.03 makes resisting arrest, search, or transportation by using force against an officer or another person a Class A misdemeanor under ordinary circumstances. If a deadly weapon is used, the offense becomes a third-degree felony.

Perhaps most importantly for this scenario, Texas law expressly provides that it is not a defense to a resisting-arrest prosecution that the arrest or search was unlawful.

That creates an awful possibility.

Police may initially have the wrong person for Crime A.

If that person physically fights the officers, police may now have the right person for Crime B.

The place to fight a mistaken arrest is through evidence, attorneys, and the courts, not physically on the side of the road.

How Long Can Police Hold Me After They Realize I’m the Wrong Person?

This question becomes highly fact-specific.

The Constitution does not necessarily require every mistaken-identity claim to be resolved instantly. Officers and jail personnel may need time to verify fingerprints, photographs, warrants, or information from another agency.

Texas is within the Fifth Circuit, and older Fifth Circuit cases illustrate just how complicated these cases can become. Courts have distinguished between a reasonable initial mistake and situations in which officials possess evidence that the detained person is not actually the person sought.

That means there is no universal rule that says, for example, “Police have exactly 30 minutes to release you once you claim mistaken identity.”

A Friday-night arrest can become especially complicated if another county issued the warrant or records must be obtained from another agency.

But the longer authorities continue holding someone while increasingly strong evidence establishes that they have the wrong person, the more significant the legal questions may become.

If you or a family member believes someone is sitting in jail solely because police have confused that person with someone else, contacting a criminal defense attorney immediately may be far more productive than waiting for the system to eventually discover its own mistake.

Sitting in a Texas jail over a case of mistaken identity? Call Dunham & Jones 24/7 at 800-499-8455.

What If the Warrant Is From Another Texas County?

Suppose you are arrested in Harris County because Dallas County issued the warrant.

The officers standing in front of you may not be the people who investigated the original case, obtained the warrant, or possess all of the records necessary to resolve the mistake.

That can complicate matters.

An experienced criminal defense attorney may need to identify exactly which warrant caused the arrest, communicate with the issuing jurisdiction, obtain relevant identifying information, compare fingerprints or booking photographs, and work with prosecutors or the appropriate court to address the warrant.

This is another reason not to assume that repeating “you have the wrong person” will automatically cause the problem to disappear.

The officer may believe you.

The officer may still need the warrant legally cleared.

What Happens If My Car Is Towed During a Mistaken Arrest?

A mistaken arrest can create consequences long after the handcuffs come off.

Perhaps your vehicle was towed. You missed work. You spent money retrieving your vehicle. You missed a flight. You incurred medical expenses. You lost income. You spent hours or days in custody.

Those losses can be very real.

Whether anyone is legally required to compensate you for them is a separate question.

Can I Sue the Police If They Arrested Me by Mistake?

Possibly, but being innocent does not automatically mean you are entitled to money.

This is one of the most important distinctions in mistaken-arrest cases.

The question is not simply: Were the police wrong?

The legal question may instead be: Did police act unreasonably or violate a legally protected right?

Suppose a license plate reader reports your exact plate as belonging to a stolen vehicle. Officers confirm the alert, locate a matching vehicle, conduct a stop, and quickly discover that the underlying information was incorrect.

That can be terrifying and inconvenient without necessarily creating a successful lawsuit against the officers.

Now change the facts. The allegedly stolen vehicle is a white sedan. You are driving a black SUV. The plate does not match. Your registration matches your identity. The VIN does not match the stolen vehicle. Dispatch confirms the discrepancy. And authorities continue holding you anyway.

That is a very different factual situation.

Potential civil claims involving law enforcement can be extraordinarily complicated because constitutional standards, governmental immunity, qualified immunity, state tort law, and federal civil-rights law may all become relevant.

The answer may also depend on who actually caused the error. Was it the arresting officer? Another police department? A county employee? A database? A private technology provider? Someone who falsely reported a vehicle stolen? Someone who stole your identity?

Those questions should be evaluated individually by an attorney.

Can I Recover Lost Wages, Impound Fees, or Compensation for What Happened?

If someone has a viable civil claim arising from an unlawful arrest or detention, potential damages can depend heavily on the cause of action and the evidence.

Documented financial losses may matter. That could include lost income, towing and storage expenses, medical bills, property damage, and other costs directly resulting from what happened.

Depending on the particular legal claim, noneconomic injuries such as physical pain or emotional distress may also become relevant.

But there is no automatic Texas “wrongful arrest payment” simply because charges were dropped or police eventually acknowledged that they arrested the wrong person.

Anyone considering a civil claim should preserve documentation immediately. Keep towing receipts, impound bills, employment records showing missed work, medical records, photographs, correspondence, and any other evidence of measurable losses.

An attorney can determine whether the facts support a claim and which person or governmental entity, if any, may legally be responsible.

What Happens to the Arrest Record After Everyone Agrees It Wasn’t Me?

Do not assume that being released automatically cleans up every record associated with the incident.

This can be especially important when another person has used your identity.

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 55A.006 specifically provides an avenue for expunging identifying information in qualifying mistaken-identity situations. Article 55A.256 establishes an application process and requires authenticated fingerprint records, along with identifying and arrest information.

That can matter enormously.

You do not want to discover during another traffic stop, employment background check, or future encounter with law enforcement that someone else’s arrest is still connected to your identity.

An experienced attorney can determine whether you qualify for mistaken-identity expunction or another form of relief and help make sure the problem is addressed rather than merely forgotten.

What If Police Had the Right Person but the Wrong Crime?

Suppose police correctly identify and arrest you, but the accusation itself is false.

That is not necessarily a mistaken-identity case.

Maybe a witness was wrong. Maybe someone deliberately lied. Maybe surveillance footage was misunderstood. Maybe someone else was driving your vehicle. Maybe investigators drew the wrong conclusion from phone or location information.

You may still have a powerful defense.

But your attorney’s task will be different from simply proving, “My client is not the person named in this warrant.”

The attorney may need to challenge probable cause, investigate witnesses, preserve surveillance footage, obtain electronic records, establish an alibi, or demonstrate that prosecutors cannot prove the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

What Should I Do Immediately After a Mistaken Arrest?

First, do not run, fight, or physically resist.

Provide truthful identifying information when legally required. Calmly tell officers if you believe they have mistaken you for another person and identify any obvious, objective way to verify the mistake.

Do not consent to searches merely because you hope cooperation will make everything disappear.

Do not provide false information.

Do not try to explain every detail of the alleged offense.

Ask for an attorney before answering investigative questions.

If you are released, write down what happened while your memory is fresh. Preserve documents, photographs, receipts, and records relating to the incident.

Most importantly, do not assume the matter is finished simply because you walked out of jail.

Why You Should Contact an Experienced Texas Criminal Defense Attorney Immediately

Mistaken-identity cases can require action before a criminal case ever reaches trial.

An experienced criminal defense attorney may be able to identify the warrant or allegation that caused the arrest, obtain booking records, compare fingerprints and photographs, communicate with prosecutors, preserve surveillance or electronic evidence, address bond and release issues, challenge probable cause, and determine what needs to happen to correct inaccurate records.

Depending on the facts, an attorney may be able to persuade prosecutors to reduce charges or dismiss them entirely. If the wrong person was arrested, counsel can also determine whether expunction is available and whether the circumstances should be reviewed separately by an attorney experienced in civil-rights or wrongful-detention claims.

When choosing representation, look for an established Texas criminal defense firm with experience handling serious criminal allegations, warrants, mistaken identity, and expunction issues. A larger reputable firm may also have the resources to begin investigating quickly, obtain records, and coordinate issues involving multiple jurisdictions.

If police have arrested you for something you did not do, waiting for the system to figure it out on its own can be a costly gamble.

Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney as soon as possible.

Frequently Asked Questions About Mistaken Arrests in Texas

Frequently asked questions about mistaken arrests in Texas.

Can Texas police arrest me because I have the same name as someone with a warrant?
A matching name can contribute to an officer’s decision, but identity involves more than a name. Dates of birth, photographs, physical descriptions, fingerprints, and other information may help determine whether you are actually the person named in the warrant. If you believe police have confused you with another person, calmly say so and request an attorney.
Should I tell the police that they have the wrong person or remain silent?
You can clearly identify a mistaken-identity problem without submitting to a full interrogation. Provide truthful identifying information when legally required, explain concisely that you believe police have the wrong person, and point out objective evidence that can verify it. Then request an attorney before answering investigative questions about the alleged crime.
What if a Flock camera incorrectly says my vehicle is stolen?
Stay calm and follow safety instructions during the stop. Tell officers that you own the vehicle and identify readily available documentation that can confirm ownership. An erroneous automated alert does not necessarily mean the officers acted unlawfully, but what police knew, what they verified, and how they responded after discovering contradictory information can become important.
Can I resist arrest if I can prove I’m innocent?
Do not physically resist merely because you believe the arrest is wrong. Texas law specifically provides that the unlawfulness of an arrest or search is not a defense to a prosecution for resisting under Penal Code Section 38.03. A mistaken arrest can therefore lead to a separate criminal charge if the person uses force against officers.
Can I sue if Texas police arrested me by mistake?
Potentially, but an incorrect arrest does not automatically create a successful civil claim. The analysis can depend on whether officers had probable cause, whether their conduct was reasonable, how long detention continued after contradictory information emerged, who caused the error, and whether governmental or qualified immunity applies.
Can I recover lost wages or towing and impound fees?
Those losses may potentially be relevant if you have a viable legal claim, but compensation is not automatic. Preserve receipts, wage records, medical bills, and other documentation and speak with an attorney about the specific circumstances.
Can a mistaken arrest be removed from my record?
Texas law specifically permits expunction of identifying information in certain mistaken-identity cases, including qualifying clerical errors and situations in which another arrested person falsely used someone’s identity without consent. The exact remedy depends on how the mistake occurred, so an attorney should review the records and determine what relief is available.

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Every case depends on its particular facts, charges, criminal history, court orders, and applicable law.

Criminal Defense Attorneys
FREE Consultation
Texas · Tennessee

Texas Law Offices · Tennessee Law Office
No Money Down · Easy Payment Plans · Affordable Fees · Credit/Debit Cards Accepted
Dunham & Jones, Attorneys at Law, P.C.
ABOUT · CONTACT · CAREERS · PRIVACY · MAKE A PAYMENT
The information on this website is about legal issues and is not legal advice. Information on the website and communications generated from this website should not be taken as legal advise and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Only a signed contract with the the law firm Dunham & Jones, Attorneys at Law, P.C. constitutes an attorney-client relationship. Consultation by appointment only.
© Copyright 1989-2026 · Dunham & Jones, Attorneys at Law, P.C. · All Rights Reserved